Enterprise & IT Asset Management Solutions: Detailed Provider Analysis

IT Asset Management (ITAM) is the systematic tracking and optimization of technology hardware and software throughout their lifecycle from procurement to disposal. It's critical for controlling costs, ensuring license compliance, reducing security risks from untracked assets, and maximizing ROI on technology investments.

This comparison article covers physical asset management consultants, EAM software specialists, IT asset lifecycle services, and disposition providers. We evaluate core capabilities: asset lifecycle management, system implementation, data quality, maintenance optimization, ITAM strategy, and ITAD compliance.

We also examine what matters for execution: service models, industry expertise, technology platforms, compliance frameworks, and proof requirements before commitment.

The goal is straightforward. Match your asset management challenge to the right provider type. Verify they deliver in your environment. Confirm you can sustain results with your team and budget. The analysis below gives you the technical detail to make that decision with confidence.

‍

1. COSOL

Key Features

• Asset Management Services: Strategy development, maintenance optimization, maturity uplift, working capital improvement, process optimization, and embedded operations support.
• Digital Asset Management: ERP/EAM system strategy, performance uplift, data migration and quality (AI-powered assessments), system add-ons (OnPlan digital maintenance, GIS, digital twin, mobility).
• Asset Management as a Service (AMaaS): Maintenance scheduling, planning, and work management as fully managed services; 24/7 managed support; data and master data governance as a service; AI asset lifecycle analytics.
• Industry specialization: Natural resources (mining, oil & gas), energy and water utilities, transport and infrastructure, government and defense.
• Technology partnerships: Hitachi Ellipse, SAP, IBM Maximo, Esri ArcGIS, and proprietary tools (OnPlan, RP Connect).
• OnPlan: Digitizes paper-based maintenance work instructions for field execution.

Considerations

• COSOL is a services and advisory firm, not a software vendor. Outcomes depend on your chosen EAM platform and internal operating discipline.
• Heavy focus on asset-intensive industries; may be overkill for organizations with simpler asset portfolios.
• Geographic presence primarily Australia/APAC with expanding Americas footprint; validate local delivery capacity.

Pros

• End-to-end asset management capability from strategy through 24/7 operations.
• Deep industry expertise in mining, utilities, and infrastructure with proven field experience.
• Proprietary AI-powered data quality and migration tools reduce risk in EAM transformations.
• AMaaS model provides fully managed maintenance planning, scheduling, and data governance without internal headcount.

Cons

• Not a platform vendor; requires separate EAM software licensing (Maximo, SAP, Ellipse).
• Services-heavy model may have higher ongoing costs than in-house teams for mature organizations.
• OnPlan and proprietary tools create some vendor lock-in for digital work management.

Best Suited For

• Asset-intensive organizations (utilities, mining, transport, manufacturing) needing end-to-end EAM transformation, from strategy and system implementation to ongoing managed operations.

Evaluation questions for the vendor

• What EAM platforms have you implemented most in the last 24 months in our industry? Reference architectures and timelines?
• How do you structure master data remediation at scale? What's your AI-powered data quality assessment process?
• What are typical SLAs for your AMaaS offerings (scheduling accuracy, plan compliance, data quality scores)?
• How does OnPlan integrate with our existing EAM and what's the mobile device/offline capability?
• Can you provide case studies showing measurable asset performance improvement (uptime, MTBF, maintenance cost reduction)?
• What's your model for knowledge transfer and capability building so we're not permanently dependent?

‍

2. PragmaEdge

Key Features

• IBM Maximo specialist: Implementation, migration, upgrade, customization, and testing of IBM Maximo Application Suite (MAS).
• Maximo Application Suite (MAS): Integrated platform for asset management, IT service management, visual inspection (AI/computer vision), and facilities management.
• Migration services: EAM to MAS upgrades, IBM Control Desk to Maximo IT migration.
• Maximo Testing: Java/Selenium-based test automation framework for non-production Maximo environments.
• Maximo Visual Inspection: AI-powered computer vision for quality control and asset inspection.
• Maximo SaaS: Dedicated SaaS deployment on AWS, Azure, or GCP with full managed services.
• Industry solutions: Maximo IT (ITSM/ITAM), Maximo Real Estate & Facilities, Maximo for Airports.
• IBM Gold Partner: Reselling, implementation, and support for IBM technologies.

Considerations

• Maximo-centric; if you're not on IBM Maximo or planning to adopt it, PragmaEdge isn't the right fit.
• Implementation and customization expertise, but less emphasis on frontline asset management advisory (compared to COSOL).
• Broader digital transformation portfolio (API management, integration, automation) may dilute pure EAM focus.

Pros

• Deep IBM Maximo expertise with full lifecycle support (implementation, upgrade, testing, customization).
• Maximo Visual Inspection brings AI/computer vision to asset condition monitoring and quality control.
• SaaS deployment flexibility across major cloud providers with managed services.
• Test automation framework reduces risk and accelerates Maximo upgrades and changes.

Cons

• Platform lock-in to IBM Maximo ecosystem.
• Less evidence of frontline operational asset management consulting (maintenance strategy, reliability engineering).
• Geographic and industry case study visibility is limited on public materials.

Best Suited For

• Organizations committed to IBM Maximo (or migrating to MAS) needing implementation, upgrade, customization, and managed SaaS operations, especially in IT, facilities, and aviation sectors.

Evaluation questions for the vendor

• How many MAS implementations have you completed in the last 18 months? Average timeline and team size?
• What's your approach to Maximo customization vs. configuration? How do you manage upgrade paths?
• Can you demonstrate your test automation framework in action? Coverage and maintenance overhead?
• What SLAs do you provide for Maximo SaaS (uptime, support response, patching cadence)?
• How does Maximo Visual Inspection integrate with existing condition monitoring and inspection workflows?
• What's your process for migrating from legacy EAM or Control Desk? Data migration success rates and validation?

‍

3. ITS (WeBuildITS)

Key Features

• IBM Maximo expertise: Full lifecycle support for Maximo Asset Management, mobile Maximo, Maximo cloud, and IBM Control Desk.
• Maximo 911: Emergency support and troubleshooting for urgent Maximo issues.
• Maximo Cloud/MaaS: Flexible cloud deployment options including Maximo as a Service with hosting and managed operations.
• Business process review: Assessment and optimization of maintenance and asset management workflows.
• Maximo staffing: Contract and permanent Maximo specialists to fill expertise gaps.
• MaxAware: Proprietary monitoring tool for IBM Maximo performance and health tracking.
• Maximo training: Custom training programs for administrators, users, and technical staff.
• FedRAMP and security solutions: Secure cloud deployments for government and regulated sectors.
• IBM Maximo Application Suite (MAS): Implementation and migration support for MAS 8.x.

Considerations

• Maximo-only focus; not suitable if you're evaluating other EAM platforms.
• Smaller scale than PragmaEdge or COSOL; validate capacity for large enterprise deployments.
• Strong government/public sector presence (Edwards AFB, NARA references); commercial sector case studies less visible.

Pros

• Deep Maximo expertise with business process focus, not just technical implementation.
• Maximo 911 provides rapid response for production issues and emergencies.
• MaxAware monitoring tool offers proactive health tracking and performance optimization.
• Strong client testimonials emphasizing business process improvement and responsiveness.
• Flexible staffing model to augment internal teams without full outsourcing.

Cons

• Smaller geographic footprint and delivery capacity compared to larger integrators.
• Limited public evidence of scale (number of clients, projects, certifications).
• Proprietary MaxAware tool creates some vendor dependency for monitoring.

Best Suited For

• Mid-market to enterprise organizations on IBM Maximo needing implementation, business process optimization, emergency support, and flexible staffing augmentation—especially in government and regulated sectors.

Evaluation questions for the vendor

• What's your typical engagement model: full implementation, staff augmentation, or managed services?
• How does MaxAware integrate with existing monitoring tools (APM, SIEM)? What metrics and alerts does it provide?
• What's your Maximo 911 SLA for response time and resolution? Pricing model?
• Can you provide reference cases in our industry showing business process improvement outcomes?
• What's your approach to Maximo cloud migration? Hosting options and security certifications (FedRAMP, etc.)?
• How do you structure knowledge transfer and training to build internal capability?

‍

4. GDT

Key Features

• IT Asset Management (ITAM) strategy: Lifecycle assessments, cost optimization, and compliance management for IT hardware and software.
• Software and maintenance lifecycle assessment: Identify savings opportunities across Cisco and other vendor estates (claims of $1.75M+ potential savings).
• IT cost optimization: Vendor management, contract negotiation, license optimization, and total cost of ownership (TCO) reduction.
• Professional services: IT strategy, consulting, assessments, and advisory for modernization and transformation.
• Managed services: Ongoing IT operations, support, and lifecycle management.
• Technology solutions: Hybrid data center, cybersecurity, networking, collaboration, and cloud solutions.
• Vendor partnerships: Cisco, HPE, NetApp, Juniper, Fortinet, and other leading technology providers.
• 30-year heritage: 900+ employees, $1.4B annual revenue, 100+ countries supported, 450+ certified architects and engineers.

Considerations

• GDT is a broad IT solutions integrator; ITAM is one capability among many (cybersecurity, networking, data center).
• Physical/operational asset management (EAM) is not a focus; primarily IT infrastructure lifecycle.
• A large-scale integrator model may have less agility for niche ITAM needs compared to specialists.

Pros

• Comprehensive ITAM lifecycle assessments with quantified savings potential.
• Massive vendor ecosystem and negotiating power for cost optimization.
• End-to-end IT transformation capabilities (strategy, implementation, managed services).
• Significant scale and global reach for enterprise deployments.

Cons

• Not an EAM platform or physical asset management provider.
• ITAM is embedded within broader IT services; may lack depth vs. pure-play ITAM specialists.
• Assessment-to-execution model requires commitment to GDT's broader service portfolio for maximum value.

Best Suited For

• Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing IT asset lifecycle optimization, vendor cost reduction, and managed IT services as part of broader infrastructure modernization.

Evaluation questions for the vendor

• What's your ITAM assessment methodology? How do you quantify savings and validate recommendations?
• How do you integrate ITAM data with CMDB, ITSM, and financial systems for full lifecycle visibility?
• What ongoing ITAM managed services do you provide post-assessment (tracking, compliance, refresh planning)?
• Can you provide case studies showing realized ITAM savings and ROI timelines?
• How do you handle multi-vendor environments and optimize across the entire IT estate, not just preferred partners?
• What ITAM tools and platforms do you use or recommend? Do you provide implementation and integration?

‍

5. Inteleca

Key Features

• IT Asset Disposition (ITAD): R2v3 certified secure data destruction, hardware decommissioning, remarketing, and recycling.
• Asset lifecycle management: Procurement through disposition with compliance auditing and real-time tracking.
• Remarketing: Value recovery from used IT equipment; specialized HPC (high-performance computing) remarketing.
• Data security: NIST-compliant data wiping, EPA-compliant recycling, full chain-of-custody documentation.
• IT services: Network design, installation, configuration, physical security systems (Axis cameras, access control), and maintenance/support.
• Hardware sales: New, refurbished, and pre-owned networking equipment (Cisco, Juniper, Arista, HP, Dell) with lifetime warranty.
• Certifications: R2v3, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001.
• 25+ years of ITAD experience with in-house team.

Considerations

• ITAD and IT infrastructure focus; not an EAM software vendor or operational asset management consultant.
• Best for IT hardware lifecycle (networking, servers, storage), not industrial/physical asset management.
• Smaller scale than GDT but deeper ITAD specialization and compliance.

Pros

• R2v3 certified ITAD with 25+ years of experience and in-house team.
• Full IT asset lifecycle from procurement, deployment, support, through secure disposition and remarketing.
• Value recovery through certified refurbishment and remarketing reduces net IT spend.
• Compliance-driven with full audit trails, certifications, and environmental responsibility.

Cons

• ITAD and IT infrastructure only; no EAM software or physical asset management capabilities.
• Geographic and industry case study visibility is limited compared to larger integrators.
• Smaller vendor ecosystem than GDT for procurement breadth.

Best Suited For

• Organizations needing secure, compliant IT asset disposition and value recovery, combined with network design, hardware procurement, and IT support services.

Evaluation questions for the vendor

• What's your end-to-end ITAD process from pickup through data destruction, remarketing, and recycling?
• How do you ensure NIST-compliant data destruction and provide audit-ready documentation?
• What's your typical value recovery rate for different hardware types (servers, networking, storage)?
• Can you handle on-site ITAD for data centers and large-scale hardware refreshes?
• What certifications and compliance frameworks do you maintain (R2v3, ISO, EPA)?
• How do you integrate ITAD with our existing IT asset management and procurement processes?
• What's your remarketing process and how do you maximize return while ensuring data security?

‍

Comparative Analysis of Asset Management Tools

‍

Practical Takeaways

1. Match your asset type to the right provider

Physical/operational assets (utilities, mining, manufacturing, transport):

• COSOL for end-to-end EAM transformation with platform flexibility
• PragmaEdge or ITS if committed to IBM Maximo

IT hardware and software assets:

• GDT for lifecycle optimization and cost reduction
• Inteleca for secure disposition and value recovery

2. Sequence your asset management program to build capability

Phase 1: Foundation

• Assess current state and define strategy (COSOL for physical assets; GDT for IT assets)
• Select EAM platform if needed (Maximo, SAP, Ellipse)

Phase 2: Implementation

• Deploy EAM software and migrate data (COSOL, PragmaEdge, or ITS for Maximo)
• Establish ITAM tracking and compliance (GDT)

Phase 3: Optimization

• Improve maintenance processes and data quality (COSOL AMaaS; ITS business process review)
• Optimize IT costs and contracts (GDT assessments)

Phase 4: Sustainment

• Ongoing managed services (COSOL, PragmaEdge, ITS, GDT)
• Secure hardware retirement and value recovery (Inteleca ITAD)

3. Data quality is the foundation—invest early

• COSOL's AI-powered data quality assessments and RP Connect migration tools reduce EAM transformation risk
• Bad master data derails maintenance planning, inventory optimization, and asset performance
• Fix it before go-live, not after

4. Choose managed services if you lack internal expertise

• COSOL's AMaaS provides 24/7 maintenance planning, scheduling, and data governance
• PragmaEdge and ITS offer Maximo SaaS with managed operations
• GDT provides ongoing ITAM lifecycle management
• Define clear SLAs, KPIs, and knowledge transfer plans to avoid permanent dependency

5. Don't ignore IT asset disposition—it's compliance and value recovery

• ITAD is often an afterthought until an audit or data breach
• Inteleca's R2v3 certified ITAD ensures secure data destruction and value recovery
• Integrate ITAD with ITAM and procurement for full lifecycle visibility

6. Platform lock-in considerations

• PragmaEdge and ITS lock you into IBM Maximo; ensure long-term platform commitment
• COSOL offers platform flexibility (Maximo, SAP, Ellipse) but proprietary tools (OnPlan, RP Connect) create some dependency
• ITS MaxAware monitoring tool is proprietary; validate integration with existing APM/monitoring stacks

7. Validate industry expertise and reference cases

• COSOL's mining, utilities, and infrastructure experience is critical for asset-intensive operations
• ITS has strong government/public sector references (Edwards AFB, NARA)
• PragmaEdge shows aviation, facilities, and IT focus
• GDT's cross-industry scale is valuable for standardized ITAM

8. Emergency support and rapid response matter

• ITS Maximo 911 provides dedicated emergency support for production issues
• COSOL's 24/7 AMaaS includes rapid response
• Validate SLAs, response times, and escalation procedures before committing

9. Measure outcomes, not just activity

Track and require proof of:

• Physical assets: uptime, MTBF, maintenance cost reduction, inventory optimization, data quality scores
• IT assets: cost savings realized, license optimization, compliance improvement, value recovery from ITAD

10. Build internal capability alongside external services

• Leverage ITS training programs and COSOL's knowledge transfer
• Use staffing augmentation (ITS Maximo staffing) to build internal skills
• Avoid black-box managed services; insist on runbooks and capability development

‍

Evaluation Lens for IT Leaders

Strategic Fit and Scope

• Physical vs. IT assets: COSOL/PragmaEdge/ITS for operational assets; GDT/Inteleca for IT assets
• Platform commitment: Maximo-only (PragmaEdge, ITS) vs. platform-agnostic (COSOL)
• End-to-end vs. point solutions: Full lifecycle (COSOL, GDT) vs. specialized (Inteleca ITAD, ITS emergency support)

Platform and Technology

• Are you committed to IBM Maximo, or evaluating multiple EAM platforms?
• What's the integration complexity with existing ERP, CMDB, ITSM, and BI systems?
• Is the provider's technology stack (OnPlan, MaxAware, RP Connect, Maximo Visual Inspection) proven at scale?

Data and Master Data Management

• How will you assess and remediate data quality before EAM go-live? (COSOL's AI-powered DQA)
• What's the data migration success rate and validation process?
• How will you sustain data quality post-implementation? (COSOL MDGaaS)

Operational Delivery and Managed Services

• What SLAs do you need for maintenance planning, scheduling, work management, and system support?
• Can the provider deliver 24/7 operations or emergency response? (COSOL AMaaS, ITS Maximo 911)
• What's the knowledge transfer and capability development plan?

ITAM and Cost Optimization

• How will you optimize IT asset costs and vendor contracts? (GDT assessments)
• What ITAM tools and integration with CMDB/ITSM are required?
• Can you quantify expected savings and validate with reference cases?

ITAD and Hardware Lifecycle

• How will you handle IT hardware retirement, data destruction, and value recovery? (Inteleca)
• What compliance frameworks are required (R2v3, NIST, EPA, ISO)?
• Can you integrate ITAD with ITAM and procurement for full lifecycle visibility?

Compliance, Security, and Risk

• What certifications and audit trails are required (R2v3, FedRAMP, ISO, SOC 2)?
• How is data security ensured during migration, operations, and disposition?
• What's the disaster recovery and business continuity plan for managed services?

Cost and Value

• Total cost of ownership: software licensing, implementation, managed services, ITAD
• How do you measure ROI: asset uptime, maintenance cost reduction, ITAM savings, value recovery?
• What financing options are available? (GDT procurement optimization)

Proof Requirements Before Commitment

Live demos:

• COSOL OnPlan mobile work execution and RP Connect data migration
• PragmaEdge Maximo Visual Inspection
• ITS MaxAware monitoring and Maximo 911 response process
• GDT ITAM assessment methodology
• Inteleca ITAD process walkthrough

Pilot success criteria:

• ≥95% data migration accuracy
• ≥98% maintenance plan compliance
• Measurable asset uptime improvement (physical assets)
• Documented ITAM cost savings (IT assets)
• Documented value recovery from ITAD

Reference cases:

• Similar industry, asset types, and scale
• Quantified outcomes (uptime, cost reduction, compliance)
• Post-implementation sustainability evidence

‍

Closing Thoughts

Asset management spans physical operations, IT infrastructure, and end-of-life hardware. Each requires specialized expertise.

COSOL delivers end-to-end physical asset management for asset-intensive industries. PragmaEdge and ITS implement and operate IBM Maximo at scale. GDT optimizes IT asset lifecycles and costs. Inteleca provides certified ITAD and value recovery.

Your asset type and maturity determine your partner. Match the provider to your need, verify delivery in your environment, and confirm you can sustain results.

In a market where hundreds of vendors sit idle in your inbox, having less is more. The priviledge of evaluating vendors at your pace and choosing from those who are already great fit for you is underrated.

Which is what TechnologyMatch offers:

• Signup for the platform and explore a vetted list of vendors who can become long term partners.
• Connect with vendors who match your preference and requirements.
• Make the first move because vendors can't connect with you unless you want to.